1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 532 F.Supp.
  5. 532 F.Supp. 1040 (1980)
 

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM, ETC. v. PHARMADYNE LAB.

Civ. No. 79-738.

532 F.Supp. 1040 (1980)

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM G.m.b.H., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHARMADYNE LABORATORIES, et al., Defendants. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM G.m.b.H., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PREMO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 24, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morgan, Finnegan, Pine, Foley & Lee, New York City, Kuttner & Toner, Livingston, N. J., for plaintiffs.

Kirschstein, Kirschstein, Ottinger & Cobrin, P. C., New York City, Podvey & Sachs, P. C., Newark, N. J., Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LACEY, District Judge.

THE COURT: In these consolidated actions plaintiffs charged the defendants with patent infringement and unfair competition. The patent issues were resolved by a consent judgment entered against the defendants. Plaintiffs' claims that defendants violated § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and the New Jersey law of unfair competition, were tried before the court without a jury. The following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases