1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 619 F.2d
  5. 619 F.2d 798 (1980)
 

UNITED STATES v. B. F. GOODRICH CO.

No. 79-4009.

619 F.2d 798 (1980)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, State of California et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. B. F. GOODRICH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

As Amended July 15, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald W. Palmer, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for defendant-appellant; Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief.

Linda L. Tedeschi, San Francisco, Cal., argued for State of California et al.

Peter L. de la Cruz, Washington, D. C. argued for United States, Robert B. Nicholson, Washington, D. C. and Bernard H. Meyers, San Francisco, Cal., on the brief.

Before TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

B. F. Goodrich Company (Goodrich) appeals from an order permitting the State of California and fifteen other states to inspect and copy federal grand jury materials.

In September 1976, a special grand jury was empaneled in the Northern District of California to investigate possible violations of the antitrust laws in Goodrich's sale of tires in six western states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. The grand jury called...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases