After a jury trial, defendant was convicted on May 17, 1979, of homicide by vehicle and driving under the influence of alcohol. Defendant's motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial are the subject of this opinion.
Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in support of both of his post-verdict motions. Defendant in his brief incorrectly states the law...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.