1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 471 F.Supp.
  5. 471 F.Supp. 412 (1979)
 

MRAZEK v. SUFFOLK CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 78-C-2191 (JBW).

471 F.Supp. 412 (1979)

Robert MRAZEK et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

June 7, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Thomas Boyle, Smithtown, N. Y., for plaintiffs.

Donald W. Leo, Coram, N. Y., for defendant Conservative Party of Suffolk County.

Leonard D. Wexler, Smithtown, N. Y., for defendants Lack and Wertz.

Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. of the State of New York, New York City, for defendant Attorney General, A. Seth Greenwald, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City, of counsel.

Howard E. Pachman, County Atty. of Suffolk County, Hauppauge, N. Y., for defendant Suffolk County Board of Elections.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Suffolk County Conservative party's method for designating Senate and Assembly candidates who are not enrolled party members. They have not demonstrated any factual or legal basis for their motion for summary judgment.

I. FACTS

Shortly before the November, 1978 general election, plaintiffs—...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases