1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 465 F.Supp.
  5. 465 F.Supp. 355 (1979)
 

MEAD CORP. v. ALLENDALE MUT. INS. CO.

No. C75-1035.

465 F.Supp. 355 (1979)

The MEAD CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALLENDALE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

January 3, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin L. Karp, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Lawrence Zelle, Minneapolis, Minn., David Davies, Arter & Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant Allendale.

Selvin Seidel, Hale, Russell, Gray, Seaman & Birkett, New York, New York, Daniel W. Hammer, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants ASEA and Stal-Laval.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

MANOS, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Mead Corporation (hereinafter "Mead"), was organized under the laws of Ohio and has its principal place of business in Ohio. Mead has brought this action against four defendants, Allendale Mutual Insurance Co. (hereinafter "Allendale"), Allmanna Suenska Elektriska Aktiebolaget Inc. (hereinafter "ASEA Inc."), Stal-Laval Turbine AB (hereinafter "Stal-Laval"), and Allmanna Suenska Elektriska...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases