GLASSMAKER v. RICARD

No. 2849-3.

23 Wn. App. 35 (1979)

593 P.2d 179

WILLIAM W. GLASSMAKER, Appellant, v. NOEL RICARD, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

April 3, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe McAdams, for appellant.

Velikanje, Moore & Shore and George F. Velikanje, for respondents.


GREEN, C.J.

The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants to collect the accelerated balance of a promissory note which was in default. The trial court concluded that acceleration was not justified because the delinquent installment payment had been made before the defendants were actually apprised of plaintiffs' election to accelerate the balance. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

The sole issue is whether plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases