1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 166 N.J.
  5. 166 N.J. Super. 354 (1979)
 

PROJECT HOLDING, INC. v. SMYTH

166 N.J. Super. 354 (1979)

399 A.2d 1033

PROJECT HOLDING, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND ACTION COMMITTEE OF FLORAL PARK, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, ET AL., INTERVENORS, v. FRANK SMYTH ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Goldberg argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Laurence B. Orloff argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, attorneys; Messrs. Laurence B. Orloff, Jeffrey M. Garrod and Raymond A. Brown on the brief).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, KOLE and MILMED.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with Judge Kentz that the Anti-Eviction Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1 et seq. is inapplicable to the factual circumstances presented in this case. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in his opinion reported at 152 N.J.Super. 582, insofar as they reach that conclusion.

Since we find N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases