1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 254 S.E.2d
  5. 254 S.E.2d 221 (1979)
 

GARLAND v. SHULL

No. 7825SC656.

254 S.E.2d 221 (1979)

41 N.C. App. 143

Josephine H. GARLAND v. Bobby McKinley SHULL and Myrtle Baker Shull.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 1, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byrd, Byrd, Ervin & Blanton, P. A. by Joe K. Byrd and Robert B. Byrd, Morganton, for plaintiff-appellee.

Mitchell, Teele & Blackwell by W. Harold Mitchell, Valdese, for defendants-appellants.

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendants assign as error the admission of Dr. Powell's testimony concerning his opinion of the future duration of the plaintiff's headaches. After Dr. Powell was asked the hypothetical question, the defendant objected. The trial court then conducted a voir dire examination of the witness. During the voir dire examination, Dr. Powell testified that it was his opinion "That these headaches have resulted from the accident, and that although they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases