1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 78 N.J.
  5. 78 N.J. 378 (1979)
 

PATERSON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. SCHULMAN

78 N.J. 378 (1979)

396 A.2d 573

PATERSON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAX SCHULMAN AND SALLY SCHULMAN, HIS WIFE, AND WAMAC, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 4, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Zax argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph A. La Cava, attorney).

Mr. Richard L. Rudin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Robert S. Tobin argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.

The main issue in this case involves the extent to which defendants Max and Sally Schulman are entitled to reimbursement for relocation expenses incurred as a consequence of the condemnation of their business property. Also at issue is the propriety of defendants' failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing an appeal to Superior Court. Defendants claim entitlement under the Constitution, the Relocation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases