STATE v. LAIL

No. 7827SC1167.

254 S.E.2d 201 (1979)

41 N.C. App. 178

STATE of North Carolina v. William Timothy LAIL, Jr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 1, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten, by Asst. Atty. Gen. James Wallace, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Robert H. Forbes, Gastonia, for defendant appellant.


ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant's argument that hearsay testimony was admitted is without merit. None of the testimony which defendant challenges under this assignment of error falls within the definition of hearsay, that is, an assertion of a person other than the witness which is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. 1 Stansbury's N.C. Evidence § 138 (Brandis rev. 1973). Two of the challenged statements are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases