1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. T.C.
  4. 73 T.C.
  5. 73 T.C. 329 (1979)
 

GEGAX v. COMMISSIONER

Docket Nos. 109-77, 177-77, 515-77, 1093-77, 1436-77, 1903-77.

73 T.C. 329 (1979)

STEVEN GEGAX AND MARY GEGAX, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT

United States Tax Court.

Filed November 26, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Gegax and Mary Gegax, pro se in docket No. 109-77.

Randolph J. Smith, pro se in docket No. 177-77.

William Kelly and Penny Kelly, pro se in docket No. 515-77.

Jane Classen Davis, pro se in docket No. 1093-77.

James E. Powell, pro se in docket No. 1436-77.

Melvin L. Duus and Cecilia Duus, pro se in docket No. 1903-77.

Virginia C. Schmid, for the respondent.

OPINION

TIETJENS, Judge:

Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income tax for 1974 as follows:


               Petitioners                      Deficiency
   Steven K. Gegax and Mary F. Gegax ------------  $524.29
   Randolph J. Smith2 ----------------------     24,342.63
   William T. Kelly and Penny...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases