1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 79 N.J.
  5. 79 N.J. 301 (1979)
 

STATE v. BRANAM

79 N.J. 301 (1979)

399 A.2d 299

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CAROL BRANAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 26, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Anthony J. Parrillo, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Philip Vernon, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons experessed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

SCHREIBER, J., concurring.

I concur in the result, for it is not necessarily inconsistent to assert the defense of entrapment and simultaneously to deny commission of the crime under circumstances such as here, where defendant denies having the requisite mens rea. However, with respect to the elements of entrapment, I continue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases