1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 91 Mich.
  5. 91 Mich. App. 212 (1979)
 

GOLDMAN v. LOUBELLA EXTENDABLES

Docket No. 78-1048.

91 Mich. App. 212 (1979)

283 N.W.2d 695

GOLDMAN v. LOUBELLA EXTENDABLES

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided July 10, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Metry, Metry & Sanom, for plaintiff.

Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz, P.C. (by John H. Shepherd), for defendant.

Before: M.J. KELLY, P.J., and BASHARA and R.B. BURNS, JJ.

R.B. BURNS, J.

In this antitrust action plaintiff, a clothing retailer, has alleged that defendant, a clothing manufacturer, conspired or combined with plaintiff's competitors to restrict trade by stopping sales of defendant's merchandise to plaintiff because plaintiff was selling the merchandise at a discount. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on the theory that plaintiff was unable to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases