McPHERSON v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

TC 77-AB-862; CA 8816; SC 25719.

591 P.2d 1381 (1979)

285 Or. 541

Marlynn M. McPherson, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, and City of Salem, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided March 20, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Mike Dye, Dye & Olson.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Division. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen.

Jeanette Launer, Asst. City Atty., Salem, argued the cause for respondent City of Salem. With her on the brief was William J. Juza, City Atty.

Before HOLMAN, P.J., and TONGUE, HOWELL, BRYSON, LENT and LINDE, JJ.


LINDE, Justice.

Petitioner, Marlynn McPherson, seeks review of a decision of the Employment Division denying her unemployment compensation on the ground that she left her employment voluntarily and without good cause. After the "Administrator's Decision,"1 the claimant requested a hearing. A referee denied her claim upon findings of fact and conclusions of law that will be discussed below. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases