1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 80 N.J.
  5. 80 N.J. 110 (1979)
 

STATE v. SUTTON

80 N.J. 110 (1979)

402 A.2d 230

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BARBARA SUTTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 24, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas A. Pavics, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Morton L. Anekstein, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the brief).

Mr. Larry R. Etzweiler, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.

This case constitutes the third and final controversy presented to us today involving the propriety of a prosecutor's refusal to sanction a defendant's admission into a county Pretrial Intervention Program (PTI), see R. 3:28. As in State v. Bender, 80 N.J. 84 (1979) and State v. Maddocks, 80 N.J. 98 (1979), we are here called upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases