1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 478 F.Supp.
  5. 478 F.Supp. 1268 (1979)
 

VAN DYK RESEARCH CORP. v. XEROX CORP.

Civ. No. 75-419.

478 F.Supp. 1268 (1979)

VAN DYK RESEARCH CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. XEROX CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 20, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ravin & Kesselhaut, West Orange, N.J., Frank, Bernstein, Conaway & Goldman, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan & Purcell, Newark, N.J., Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

OPINION

LACEY, District Judge.

Van Dyk Corporation (Van Dyk) charged Xerox Corporation (Xerox) with violations of the antitrust laws. The case was tried before this court, sitting without a jury. A brief description of the contentions of the parties is appropriate.

Plaintiff's Contentions

Van Dyk's amended complaint charged that Xerox had violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 2) by monopolizing, by attempting to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases