1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 485 F.Supp.
  5. 485 F.Supp. 1185 (1979)
 

PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC.

No. 78 Civ. 5638(PNL).

485 F.Supp. 1185 (1979)

The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON INCORPORATED and Personal Products Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Supplemental Findings January 22, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooks, Haidt, Haffner & Delahunty, by G. Thomas Delahunty, New York City, and Thomas S. Calder and John J. Cummins, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, by Thomas C. Morrison, New York City, Michael J. Ryan, Jr., New Brunswick, New Jersey, and Christine H. Miller, New York City for defendants.

LEVAL, District Judge.

I. Introduction.

This is an action for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition and trademark dilution.1 The plaintiff, Procter & Gamble Co. ("P&G"), an Ohio corporation, is one of the country's largest manufacturers of household and personal use products. The defendants are Johnson & Johnson Incorporated ("J&J") and its wholly-owned subsidiary Personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases