1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 490 F.Supp.
  5. 490 F.Supp. 1069 (1979)
 

MENDELSOHN v. CAPITAL UNDERWRITERS, INC.

Nos. C-75-1259, C-76-1492 WHO.

490 F.Supp. 1069 (1979)

Paul MENDELSOHN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. CAPITAL UNDERWRITERS, INC.; Gary L. Di Girolamo; Gery Gomez; John L. Susott, Durwood Boeglen; California Hawaii Development, Inc.; and Dewey O. Chapman. George S. McDONALD; Jordan B. Dell'Era; James R. Casarotti; Alfred J. Thorington; Deloss Winkler; Paul Mendelsohn; Raymond Rediske, George Grossi; Alfred Gross, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. CAPITAL UNDERWRITERS, INC.; Gary L. Di Girolamo; Gery Gomez; John L. Susott; Durwood Boeglen; California Hawaii Development, Inc.; Dewey O. Chapman, Edward C. Kemper III; Mattoch, Edmunds & Kemper; Mattoch, Jember & Brown; Kemper & Watts; George G. Grubb; Carlsmith, Carlsmith, Wichman & Case; David Latham; Harris, Kerr, Foerster & Co.; James W. Boyle; Hart Wood.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

October 24, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Cooke, Brian P. Lewis, Cooke & Mack, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Humphreys, Berger & Pitto, San Jose, Cal., for defendant Capital Underwriters.

John Marshall Collins, Decker & Collins, San Jose, Cal., for defendants DiGirolamo and Boeglen.

Kenneth M. Christison, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Gomez.

Jerome Sapiro, Jr., Tobin & Tobin, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Susott.

George P. Eshoo, Redwood City, Cal., for defendants Chapman & California Hawaii.

Samuel A. Keesal, Jr., Long Beach, Cal., James W. Boyle, Carlsmith, Carlsmith, Wichman & Case, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant Carlsmith, etc.

Petty, Andrews, Tufts & Jackson, San Francisco, Cal., for all Kemper defendants.

OPINION

ORRICK, District Judge.

On April 20, 1979, following extended discovery and briefing and lengthy oral argument, and after reviewing the numerous affidavits, pleadings, documents, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and other papers filed in the above-captioned cases, this Court granted three motions for summary judgment brought by defendants Harris, Kerr, Forster & Co., an accounting firm, and David Latham, the manager of its Honolulu office...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases