1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 476 F.Supp.
  5. 476 F.Supp. 1036 (1979)
 

ROGERS v. BRITTON

No. PB-C-77-0071.

476 F.Supp. 1036 (1979)

Harold Eugene ROGERS, Petitioner, v. R. G. BRITTON and James Mabry, Respondents.

United States District Court, E. D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division.

September 27, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James I. Meyerson (N.A.A.C.P.), Nathaniel R. Jones, New York City (N.A.A.C.P.), George Howard, Jr., Pine Bluff, Ark., George E. Van Hook, El Dorado, Ark., for petitioner.

E. Alvin Schay and Jackson M. Jones, Asst. Attys. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., for respondents.

OPINION

ARNOLD, District Judge.

This is a habeas corpus case challenging petitioner's conviction of first-degree rape and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed in accordance with the verdict of the jury. On March 7, 1979, this Court filed an opinion upholding the validity of the conviction. Rogers v. Britton, 466 F.Supp. 397 (E.D. Ark.1979). The Court did not reach the question of the constitutionality of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases