1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 465 F.Supp.
  5. 465 F.Supp. 1013 (1979)
 

UNITED STATES v. WANDER

Crim. A. No. 78-34.

465 F.Supp. 1013 (1979)

UNITED STATES of America v. David WANDER, Edward Reddington.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

February 7, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Cindrich, U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Brendan Sullivan, Jr., Williamson & Connolly, Washington, D. C., James Weisman, Weisman, Passafume, Swartz & Trimm, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant Wander.

George Schumacher, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant Reddington.

OPINION

SNYDER, District Judge.

The Defendants have filed parallel motions under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure1 that we suggest to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that we would grant a new trial on remand of the record because of newly discovered evidence that a juror, Rose Marie Mullinary, deliberately concealed information on voir dire...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases