1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 596 F.2d
  5. 596 F.2d 881 (1979)
 

PUREX CORP. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

No. 76-3205.

596 F.2d 881 (1979)

PUREX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, and the Clorox Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 11, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Endicott, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert K. Wrede, Los Angeles, Cal., Daniel M. Gribbon, Washington, D. C., Powell McHenry, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Before HUFSTEDLER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Purex Corporation ("Purex") appeals from a judgment in favor of The Procter & Gamble Company ("Procter") in an action by Purex seeking damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) for claimed violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 18) and Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2). We vacate the judgment and remand to the district court for further consideration in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases