1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 468 F.Supp.
  5. 468 F.Supp. 825 (1979)
 

WEBB v. CALIFANO

Civ. Nos. S-77-335, S-75-752.

468 F.Supp. 825 (1979)

Arzelia M. WEBB, Plaintiff, v. Joseph A. CALIFANO, Jr., Defendant. Andrew GROZA, Plaintiff, v. Joseph A. CALIFANO, Jr., Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. California.

April 19, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danny D. Hullinger, Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff in Webb.

Douglas H. Drake, Weber & Drake, Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff in Groza.

Herman Sillas, U.S. Atty., Malcolm Stuart Segal, Chief Asst. U.S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for defendant in both actions.

OPINION

MacBRIDE, District Judge.

These two actions, although not consolidated, present the identical legal issue for decision, namely, what effect is to be given to objections to proposed findings and recommendations made by a United States Magistrate when the objections are not filed within the 10 day period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). That section, part of the Federal Magistrates Act, provides for de novo review of the points to which objection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases