1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 473 F.Supp.
  5. 473 F.Supp. 783 (1979)
 

MURPHY v. HEPPENSTALL CO.

Civ. A. No. 79-817 Q.

473 F.Supp. 783 (1979)

William A. MURPHY et al., Plaintiffs, v. The HEPPENSTALL COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

August 8, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Powderly, III, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

Frank J. Lucchino, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

OPINION

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are retired employees of defendant Heppenstall Company who had been receiving pension benefits until defendant's financial position became straitened and payments stopped. In a cognate case this Court by order of June 28, 1979, in No. 78-1431 terminated defendant's plan in pursuance of ERISA, and benefits guaranteed under that statute will be paid to defendant's employees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases