1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 476 F.Supp.
  5. 476 F.Supp. 775 (1979)
 

UNITED STATES v. DE PALMA

78 Cr. 401 (RWS).

476 F.Supp. 775 (1979)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. DE PALMA et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

August 15, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel H. Akerman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U. S. Atty., New York City, for plaintiff.

Cohn, Glickstein, Lurie, Ostrin & Lubell, New York City, for defendants; Jonathan W. Lubell and Mary K. O'Melveny, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

After having been found guilty by jury verdict on all counts with which he was charged,1 defendant Leonard Horwitz ("Horwitz") moved in timely fashion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29, Fed.R.Crim.P. or, in the alternative, for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33, and for such other relief as might be found appropriate. With the exception of that part of the application dealing with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases