1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 474 F.Supp.
  5. 474 F.Supp. 672 (1979)
 

ORTH-O-VISION, INC. v. HOME BOX OFFICE

No. 77 Civ. 3053.

474 F.Supp. 672 (1979)

ORTH-O-VISION, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOME BOX OFFICE, Time Inc. and Morris Tarshis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

June 27, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Beerman, New York City, for Orth-O-Vision, Inc.; Barry A. Wadler, New York City, of counsel.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for Home Box Office, Inc. and Time Inc.; Robert D. Joffe, Calvin R. House, Marc J. Schiller, Rosalyn D. Young, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

GAGLIARDI, District Judge:

Plaintiff Orth-O-Vision, Inc. ("Orth-O-Vision") has commenced this action against Home Box Office, Inc. ("HBO"), Time, Inc. ("Time"), and Morris Tarshis, Director of Franchises of the City of New York, alleging inter alia, violations of the federal antitrust laws and breach of contract. Jurisdiction lies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1337, 1343(3) and principles of pendent jurisdiction. Defendants Time and HBO...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases