1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 490 F.Supp.
  5. 490 F.Supp. 560 (1979)
 

OKC CORP. v. WILLIAMS

Civ. A. No. CA-3-78-1021-G.

490 F.Supp. 560 (1979)

OKC CORP. v. Harold M. WILLIAMS et al.

United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.

On Reconsideration February 22, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brice & Barron by George B. Davis, Dallas, Tex., Ford, Marrin, Esposito, Witmeyer & Bergman by John J. Witmeyer, III, Richard B. Marrin, New York City, Arthur Mitchell, Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Miller, G. Scott Damuth, Dallas, Tex., for OKC Corp.

Michael J. Stewart, Regional Administrator, S. E. C., Cecil S. Mathis, Jr., David A. Watson, Steven K. McGinnis, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendants; Walter E. Keller, Jr., Fort Worth, Tex., James H. Schropp, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Julie Allecta, S. E. C., Washington, D. C., of counsel.

ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.

This court's order of November 22, 1978, stated that if the SEC were sufficiently implicated in a private party taking of the Locke, Purnell report from OKC, then the agency would be found to have violated OKC's Fourth Amendment rights. Today we hold that because there was in fact no private party taking and OKC has failed to show...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases