1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 254 S.E.2d
  5. 254 S.E.2d 780 (1979)
 

STATE v. LEDFORD

No. 7924SC63.

254 S.E.2d 780 (1979)

STATE of North Carolina v. Fate LEDFORD.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 15, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Donald W. Stephens, Raleigh, for the State.

Staunton Norris, Burnsville, for defendant-appellant.

CARLTON, Judge.

In his brief, defendant brings forward six arguments out of 20 assignments of error. The remaining assignments of error are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is essential in understanding the arguments presented by defendant on appeal to note the theories of the State and the defendant at trial: The State apparently proceeded on the theory that the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases