STATE v. P.T. & L. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.


77 N.J. 20 (1978)

389 A.2d 448

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, (BOROUGH OF PARAMUS), COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. P.T. & L. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 12, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Linda A. Palazzolo argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys).

Mr. Paul Dykstra argued the cause for complainant-respondent (Messrs. McCann and Hynes, attorneys; Mr. Edward H. Hynes, on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D. (temporarily assigned).

This appeal is before the Court on direct certification to the Superior Court, Law Division,1 75 N.J. 584 (1977). The primary question for determination is whether use of vacant land as a helistop should be deemed a valid accessory use to property occupied as the headquarters of a construction company and used also for storage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases