SARRUF v. MILLER

No. 45409.

90 Wn.2d 880 (1978)

586 P.2d 466

ALEXANDER SARRUF, Respondent, v. DANIEL MILLER, ET AL, Defendants, BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 9, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Dickens and Richard J. Omata (of Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer & Morrow, P.S.), for appellant.

Jeff Spence of Evergreen Legal Services (Seattle) and Robert Beckerman, for respondent.


STAFFORD, J.

This is a direct appeal from a summary judgment which declares that RCW 49.60.180 prohibits an employer from implementing a mandatory retirement policy based upon age. We reverse and remand for new trial.

In 1969 Alexander Sarruf was hired by Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem) as an accountant weighmaster. In January 1976, Bethlehem established a policy of mandatory retirement for employees upon reaching age 65. If Sarruf were to have retired...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases