1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 584 P.2d
  5. 584 P.2d 296 (1978)
 

IN RE BARTLETT

TC 1329; SC 25691.

584 P.2d 296 (1978)

283 Or. 487

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Richard C. BARTLETT, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 12, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert J. Bannon, Portland, argued the cause and submitted a brief for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Joseph Voboril, Portland.

Thomas E. Cooney, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for the accused.

Before HOLMAN, P.J., and HOWELL, BRYSON, LENT and LINDE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary proceeding in which it is clear that the accused has violated the ethics of the profession. The Trial Board recommended suspension for one year. The Disciplinary Review Board recommended suspension for "not less than" six months. The accused contends that his misconduct merits no more than a public reprimand and a one-year probation period with a special condition that he take and pass a course in Legal Ethics "at Northwestern College...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases