1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 454 F.Supp.
  5. 454 F.Supp. 418 (1978)
 

TERUKUNI KAIUN KAISHA v. C. R. RITTENBERRY & ASSOC.

No. 78 Civ. 1086 (RLC).

454 F.Supp. 418 (1978)

TERUKUNI KAIUN KAISHA, LTD., Plaintiff, v. C. R. RITTENBERRY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

July 27, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Healy & Baillie, New York City, for plaintiff; Raymond A. Connell, Hastings on the Hudson, N.Y., of counsel.

Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin, New York City, Pray, Scott, Williamson & Marlar, Tulsa, Okl., for defendant; Seymour Glanzer, Washington, D.C., Arthur J. Galligan, New York City, Joel B. Kleinman, Washington, D.C., Roger R. Scott, Tulsa, Okl., of counsel.

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Defendant C.R. Rittenberry and Associates, Inc. ("Rittenberry") moves, under F.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and (3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), for dismissal or transfer of the action to the Northern District of Oklahoma on the grounds that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant and that venue is improper in this district, or alternatively, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for transfer to Oklahoma on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases