1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 34 Pa.Commw.
  5. 34 Pa.Commw. 50 (1978)
 

DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. v. PA. P.U.C.

Nos. 1346, 1457, 1472 and 1485 C.D. 1977.

34 Pa.Commw. 50 (1978)

Duquesne Light Company, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. Office of the Consumer Advocate, Private Complainants, City of Pittsburgh, Armco Steel Corporation and Crucible Steel, Inc., Intervenors, and United States Steel Corporation, Intervenor. Mark Widoff, the Consumer Advocate, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. United States Steel Corporation, Intervenor. The City of Pittsburgh, and its Mayor, Richard S. Caliguiri, Petitioners v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. United States Steel Corporation, Intervenor. Private Complainants, Arnheim & Neely, Inc., Agents for Multi Vest Real Estate Fund, Ltd. Series III et al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. United States Steel Corporation, Intervenor.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

February 23, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Thomas and Carroll F. Purdy, with them Jack F. Aschinger, Charles E. Thomas, Jr., and Thomas and Thomas, for Duquesne Light Company.

Kathleen Herzog Larkin, First Assistant Counsel, with her Barnett Satinsky, Chief Counsel, for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Albert D. Brandon, for Consumer Advocate.

Dennis S. Shilobod, with him Messer & Shilobod, for private complainants.

Marvin A. Fein, Utilities Counsel, with him Mead J. Mulvihill, Jr., City Solicitor, for City of Pittsburgh and Mayor Richard S. Caliguiri.

Argued December 7, 1977, before President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., WILKINSON, JR., ROGERS, BLATT and DISALLE.

OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS, February 23, 1978:

This passionately contested electric utility rate case began on October 1, 1976 when Duquesne Light Company filed with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) its Supplement No. 2 to Tariff Electric Pa. P.U.C. No. 14, proposing an annual revenue increase of $127,897,362, issued to become effective November 30, 1976. On the same day Duquesne filed a "Petition for Emergency Rate Relief" requesting that $87,273,696...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases