1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 584 F.2d
  5. 584 F.2d 148 (1978)
 

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON

Nos. 77-5315 to 77-5320 and 78-5009 to 78-5011.

584 F.2d 148 (1978)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clyde Lee JOHNSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary NOEL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeff Davis NOEL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Joe STEWART, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Earl STEWART, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William R. MORROW, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margaret NOEL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Freeman Turner MONGER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy D. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 28, 1978.

Rehearing Denied November 13, 1978.

Rehearings Denied December 22, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Foster, Memphis, Tenn. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant in No. 77-5315.

W. J. Michael Cody, U. S. Atty., Glen Reid, Jr., Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for United States.

John Allen Fox, Richmond, Va., for defendants-appellants in Nos. 77-5316, 77-5317 and 78-5009.

Arch B. Boyd, III, Memphis, Tenn. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant in No. 77-5318.

Kemper B. Durand, Memphis, Tenn. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant in No. 77-5319.

William Stephen Crain, Mountain Home, Ark. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant in No. 77-5320.

Stanley Fink, Memphis, Tenn. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant in No. 78-5010.

James F. Russell, Memphis, Tenn. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant in No. 78-5011.

Before CELEBREZZE and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.

Six defendants were convicted in a jury trial and three more defendants were convicted in a separate jury trial on several counts of distribution of heroin and conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Inasmuch as all charges arose from the same indictment and each appeal raises numerous and often overlapping issues, we have consolidated the appeals for purposes of review. For the reasons stated below, we find no merit in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases