1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 118 Ariz.
  5. 118 Ariz. 593 (1978)
 

ARMSTRONG v. CITY COURT OF SCOTTSDALE

No. 1 CA-CIV 3942.

118 Ariz. 593 (1978)

578 P.2d 1022

James R. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. CITY COURT OF the CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, E.L. Boyle, Magistrate, City Prosecutor, City of Scottsdale; CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, Real Party in Interest, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Rehearing Denied April 7, 1978.

Review Denied May 9, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Treon, Warnicke, Dann & Roush, P.A. by B. Michael Dann, Phoenix, for appellant.

Richard Filler, Scottsdale City Atty., Richard R. Zielinski, Scottsdale City Prosecutor, Lance F. Jacobs, Former Scottsdale City Prosecutor, Scottsdale, for appellees.

OPINION

EUBANK, Presiding Judge.

This case originated in the City Court of Scottsdale, where appellant Armstrong was charged with violating A.R.S. §§ 13-893(2) and 13-893(3).1 The city court magistrate denied appellant's motion to suppress certain items of evidence. The appellant sought special action relief in the superior court, and appeals from the superior court's denial of that relief. See Rule 8(a), Rules of Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases