1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 156 N.J.
  5. 156 N.J. Super. 429 (1978)
 

MULCAHY v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS

156 N.J. Super. 429 (1978)

383 A.2d 1214

JAMES MULCAHY, PLAINTIFF, v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, MIMI SARTHOU, SUPERINTENDENT OF ELECTIONS OF BERGEN COUNTY, CARL R. HARTMANN, BERGEN COUNTY CLERK, MARGARET SUMAN, BOROUGH CLERK OF THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, AND JACK TAUBER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided January 31, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John F. McCambley for plaintiff.

Mr. Malcolm Blum for defendant Jack Tauber (Messrs. Carlton & Blum, attorneys).

PETRELLA, J.S.C.

This is an election contest suit and the facts are largely undisputed. On November 8, 1977 four candidates ran for two councilman-at-large positions in the Borough of Oakland. The results of the tabulation of ballots showed the following:

                  Enright (R)    — 1928

                  Tauber (D)     — 1905

                  Mulcahy (R)    — 1903

                  Held (D)       — 1745
<...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases