TUCKER v. JACK ENSLEY COMPANY


578 P.2d 3 (1978)

34 Or.App. 335

In the matter of the Compensation of Rex J. TUCKER, Claimant, and State Accident Insurance Fund, Respondents, v. JACK ENSLEY COMPANY, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted February 28, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Kenney Roberts, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was Jones, Lang, Klein, Wolf & Smith, Portland.

Carl H. Brumund, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Rex J. Tucker.

Lester R. Huntsinger, Associate Counsel, State Accident Ins. Fund, Salem, argued the cause for respondent State Accident Ins. Fund. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, Chief Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Accident Ins. Fund, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and JOHNSON, GILLETTE and ROBERTS, JJ.


ROBERTS, Judge.

The question is whether claimant suffered a new injury and is therefore entitled to compensation under ORS 656.005(8)(a), or if an aggravation of an earlier compensated injury has occurred giving rise to a claim under ORS 656.273(1).1

This court has dealt with this problem on several different occasions. See, e.g., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. SAIF, 27 Or.App. 747

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases