1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 462 F.Supp.
  5. 462 F.Supp. 1026 (1978)
 

TAUSSIG v. JACK & JILL ONE HOUR CLEANERS, ETC.

Civ. A. No. C76-159A.

462 F.Supp. 1026 (1978)

Frederick TAUSSIG, Plaintiffs, v. JACK & JILL ONE HOUR CLEANERS, NO. 12, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 13, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl A. Rankin, Cleveland, Ohio, Edward H. Renner, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Alfred D. Lobo, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONTIE, District Judge.

This is an action for alleged infringement of a United States patent. The Court having duly heard testimony and received exhibits, the following shall constitute the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THE PARTIES

Plaintiff Frederick Taussig initiated this action to redress the alleged infringement of United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases