1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 460 F.Supp.
  5. 460 F.Supp. 795 (1978)
 

PONCY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

Civ. Nos. 76-1150, 77-703.

460 F.Supp. 795 (1978)

George W. PONCY, Theodore Morris, Jr., Rick B. Vernois and Alfred Moss v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON. G. W. PONCY, INC. and Steridyne, Inc. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

May 18, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carella, Bain, Gilfillan & Rhodes, P. A., Newark, N. J., for plaintiffs; Smathers & Thompson by G. Morton Good, Miami, Fla., of counsel.

Smith, Statton, Wise & Heher by Arthur S. Lane, Princeton, N. J., for defendant; Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler by Thomas C. Morrison and Russell C. Deyo, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

BIUNNO, District Judge.

In these consolidated cases, Johnson & Johnson asserts counterclaims against plaintiffs in connection with a trademark dispute. These claims are asserted in the Second and Third Counterclaims in Civ. 76-1150, and in the First and Second Counterclaims in Civ. 77-703. The same issues are embraced by the demand for declaratory judgment in the complaint in Civ. 77-703.

This aspect of the consolidated cases came on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases