1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 279 Md.
  5. 279 Md. 660 (1977)
 

DONNELLY ADV. CORP. v. CITY OF BALTO.

[No. 138, September Term, 1976.]

279 Md. 660 (1977)

370 A.2d 1127

DONNELLY ADVERTISING CORPORATION OF MARYLAND ET AL. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 21, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerald J. Oppel and William L. Balfour, with whom were Michael H. Davis and Ober, Grimes & Shriver on the brief, for appellants.

Richard M. Hartman, Chief City Solicitor, with whom were Benjamin L. Brown, City Solicitor, and C. Laurence Jenkins, Jr., Assistant City Solicitor, on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and ORTH, JJ.

MURPHY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The primary question presented in this case is whether § 5 (g) of the Oldtown Urban Renewal Ordinance No. 760 of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (the City), approved April 7, 1970, requiring removal of all signs in the renewal area covered by the ordinance other than those identifying the premises on which they are located, is valid and constitutional. Appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases