1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 426 F.Supp.
  5. 426 F.Supp. 404 (1977)
 

OMERNICK v. DOYLE

No. 76-C-436.

426 F.Supp. 404 (1977)

Ray OMERNICK, Plaintiff, v. James E. DOYLE et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Wisconsin.

January 27, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray Omernick, pro se.

James E. Doyle, pro se.

Bronson C. LaFollette, Wis. Atty. Gen., by Robert B. McConnell, Madison, Wis., for Daniel LaRocque and Peter J. Seidl.

DECISION AND ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, against the defendants Doyle and Seidl, a federal and state court judge, respectively, and the defendant LaRocque, a district attorney. The complaint alleges that all of the defendants are sworn to uphold the Constitution; that they "openly and flagrantly" violated the plaintiff's fifth and fourteenth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases