1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 114 Ariz.
  5. 114 Ariz. 610 (1977)
 

STATE v. SUPER. CT. OF ST. OF ARIZ., CTY. OF PIMA

No. 2 CA-CIV 2422.

114 Ariz. 610 (1977)

562 P.2d 1108

The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF ARIZONA, In and For the COUNTY OF PIMA, and the Honorable William E. Druke, Judge of the Superior Court, Respondents, and Keith Clark and Kimberly Clark, Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Rehearing Denied February 28, 1977.

Review Denied March 22, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by David R. Cole and Rhonda L. Idle, Deputy County Attys., Tucson, for petitioner.

John M. Neis, Pima County Public Defender by Michael J. Addis, Pima County Public Defender, Tucson, for real party in interest Keith Clark.

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

An order of the respondent court granting a motion to compel disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant is the subject of this special action. The State's position is that it was error to require disclosure where the informant's only role in the entire matter was to provide the law enforcement officers with sufficient information to constitute probable cause to search.

The respondent court, in granting the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases