1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 147 N.J.
  5. 147 N.J. Super. 546 (1977)
 

ESSEX CTY. WEL. BD. v. DEPT. OF INST. & AGEN.

147 N.J. Super. 546 (1977)

371 A.2d 771

ESSEX COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES AND SONDRA ENGLE, RESPONDENTS. ESSEX COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES AND IRENE STOWERS, RESPONDENTS. ESSEX COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES AND ANN GRIECO, RESPONDENTS. IN THE MATTER OF THE ESSEX COUNTY WELFARE BOARD (LOUISE BROWN). CAMDEN COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, APPELLANT, v. LINDA PERAZZELLI AND DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, RESPONDENTS. CAMDEN COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES AND ARLENE GIBSON, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 31, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Susan J. Barone and Mr. Joseph P. Brennan, Jr. argued the cause for the Essex County Welfare Board (Mr. William J. Tamburri, Counsel, Essex County Welfare Board, attorney).

Mr. Frank A. Demonsi argued the cause for the Camden County Welfare Board (Ms. Mary E. Dugdale, Chief Counsel, Camden County Welfare Board, attorney).

Mr. Richard M. Hluchan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Department of Institutions and Agencies (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Mr. Allen Zaks, of Rutgers Legal Aid Clinic, argued the cause for respondent Stowers.

Before Judges MATTHEWS, SEIDMAN and HORN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MATTHEWS, P.J.A.D.

The single issue with which we deal in these cases is whether a county welfare board, which has terminated or reduced a recipient's grant to public assistance, available through the program of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), may obtain judicial review from a final fair hearing of the Division of Public Welfare in which the Director reversed or revised the decision of the board.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases