1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 73 N.J.
  5. 73 N.J. 450 (1977)
 

LEIMGRUBER v. CLARIDGE ASSOCIATES, LTD.

73 N.J. 450 (1977)

375 A.2d 652

WILLY LEIMGRUBER AND HOPE H. LEIMGRUBER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CLARIDGE ASSOCIATES, LTD., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 14, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David W. Conrad argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Herbert R. Ezor argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Heller and Laiks, attorneys; Mr. Ezor on the brief; Mr. Murray A. Laiks, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HUGHES, C.J.

We certified, 71 N.J. 499 (1976), a judgment of the Appellate Division, whose unpublished opinion had reflected its difference of view with the trial court's decision on a question involving punitive damages.

The relatively simple issue here stems from the mutilation by the defendant-respondent Claridge Associates, Ltd. (Claridge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases