HARTWIG v. SANBORN IMPLEMENT

No. 46818.

259 N.W.2d 258 (1977)

Francis HARTWIG, Respondent, v. SANBORN IMPLEMENT, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 7, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelly & O'Leary, J. Brian O'Leary, Springfield, for appellants.

Berens, Rodenberg, O'Connor & Stoltzfus and William T. O'Connor, New Ulm, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


PER CURIAM.

This suit, as originally pleaded, was an action to recover damages for fraud and deceit arising from the sale of most of the assets of a farm implement business. At trial, however, defendant's1 liability was predicated and the action was tried on the theory of conversion. At the close of the evidence, the trial court submitted the question of damages to the jury after directing a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases