1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 279 Md.
  5. 279 Md. 167 (1977)
 

RADMAN v. HAROLD

[No. 34, September Term, 1976.]

279 Md. 167 (1977)

367 A.2d 472

H. MELVIN RADMAN v. MARY F. HAROLD ET VIR

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 7, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Bolgiano, with whom were Smith, Somerville & Case on the brief, for appellant.

Richard B. Jacobs, with whom was Joseph F. Lentz, Jr., on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and ELDRIDGE, JJ.

DIGGES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this medical malpractice case, we must determine the propriety of the trial court's refusal to permit an expert witness to express an opinion regarding the manner in which the defendant surgeon rendered his professional services. We conclude that, although the qualification of an expert witness ordinarily is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases