1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 440 F.Supp.
  5. 440 F.Supp. 1346 (1977)
 

HORWITZ v. SPRAGUE

No. 75 Civ. 3436 (CHT).

440 F.Supp. 1346 (1977)

Arthur J. HORWITZ, Plaintiff, v. Peter J. SPRAGUE, Ronald Avis and James L. D. Roser, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 17, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Landay & Miller, New York City, by Daniel R. Pinello, New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert Beshar, New York City, for defendant Peter J. Sprague.

Ginzburg, Gaines, Gaines, DeBoissiere & Newman, by Robert J. DeBoissiere, Staten Island, N. Y., for defendant Ronald Avis.

Kenneth T. Wasserman, New York City, for defendant James L. D. Roser.

MEMORANDUM

TENNEY, District Judge.

The production of a motion picture based on the Hermann Hesse novel Steppenwolf has generated litigation within this Court's diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff Arthur J. Horwitz contends that he was defrauded out of his rightful share in the motion picture project by defendants Peter J. Sprague, the eventual producer of the movie, and two initial investors in the project, Ronald Avis and James...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases