PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMIN.

Civ. A. Nos. 77-90, 77-130, 77-131, 77-144 and 77-155.

435 F.Supp. 1234 (1977)

PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. TENNECO OIL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants. PENNZOIL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants. COASTAL STATES GAS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 27, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Samuel Arsht and William O. LaMotte, III of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del., for all plaintiffs.

Paul J. Mode, Jr., Michael S. Helfer and Alan B. Sternstein of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington, D. C., for Phillips Petroleum Co.

John P. Mathis of Baker & Botts, Washington, D. C., for Tenneco Oil Co. and Pennzoil Co.

David J. Beck, Laurance C. Mosher, Jr., and J. Todd Shields of Fulbright & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for Coastal States Gas Corp.

Rush Moody, Jr., Michael J. Henke and P. Shaun Burns of Vinson & Elkins, Washington, D. C., for Continental Oil Co.

James W. Garvin, Jr., U. S. Atty., and John H. McDonald, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Stanley D. Rose, C. Max Vassanelli and Robert E. Richardson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants.


LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

Five oil companies1 have brought these actions to challenge the defendant Federal Energy Administration's ("FEA")2 interpretation and anticipated application of a regulatory scheme governing the method by which the plaintiffs raised the prices of their petroleum products as a result of increased costs incurred during a thirteen month period between January 1, 1975 and February 1, 1976...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases