1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 437 F.Supp.
  5. 437 F.Supp. 973 (1977)
 

BACHMAN v. PERTSCHUK

Civ. A. No. 76-0079.

437 F.Supp. 973 (1977)

Donald L. BACHMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael PERTSCHUK, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

September 26, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allee A. Ramadhan, Arthur P. Wheatley, Patricia J. Barry, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Earl J. Silbert, U. S. Atty., Robert N. Ford, Robert M. Werdig, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

The issue in this case is whether an attorney for a plaintiff class, who is employed by the defendant federal agency and who is himself a member of the class, has a sufficient conflict of interest such that he should be disqualified from representing the class. This Court finds that these conflicts of interest in this particular case may jeopardize the interests of the class. Therefore, the class action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases