1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 230 S.E.2d
  5. 230 S.E.2d 680 (1976)
 

STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. EDMISTEN

No. 7610UC476.

230 S.E.2d 680 (1976)

31 N.C. App. 552

STATE of North Carolina ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Applicant, v. Rufus L. EDMISTEN, Attorney General.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 1, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. Robert P. Gruber and Associate Atty. Gen. Jerry B. Fruitt, Raleigh, for the State.

North Carolina Utilities Commission by Commission Atty. Edward B. Hipp and Associate Atty. Antoinette R. Wike, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

Joyner & Howison by Robert C. Howison, Jr., Raleigh, and R. Frost Branon, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company.

VAUGHN, Judge.

The Attorney General does not contend that the total amount of additional revenues, $28,148,633.00 is excessive. He only contests the structure of one of the many rates and charges that make up the approved rate schedule. That attack is on the portion of the order wherein the Commission seeks, in summary: to take part of the cost of directory assistance off of the customer who does not use the directory assistance service and place it on those who do...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases