lgl-menu-link">Featured Decisions
  • Latest Decisions
  • Browse Decisions
  • Advanced Search
  • Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
    Sign in
     

    ROSEN v. ROSEN

    No. 98-0433.

    738 So.2d 474 (1999)

    Francine ROSEN, Appellant/cross-appellee, v. Louis E. ROSEN, Appellee/cross-appellant.

    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

    July 28, 1999.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Neil B. Jagolinzer of Christiansen and Jacknin, West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross-appellee.

    Robert I. Barrar of The Law Offices of Ellis Rubin and Robert I. Barrar, Miami, for appellee/cross-appellant.


    PER CURIAM.

    Francine Rosen raises fourteen points in her appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of her marriage; Louis Rosen cross-appeals. We reverse as to two points, affirm as to all others with the exception of the attorney's fee issue which is not ripe for appeal, see Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and write to address one issue we believe merits...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases

      STATE v. COLLINS | 224 S.E.2d 647 (1976) | se2d6471808 | Leagle.com
       

      STATE v. COLLINS

      No. 7626SC4.

      224 S.E.2d 647 (1976)

      29 N.C. App. 478

      STATE of North Carolina v. John COLLINS.

      Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

      May 19, 1976.


      Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

      Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Robert P. Gruber, Raleigh, for the State.

      Waggoner, Hasty & Kratt by John H. Hasty, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.


      ARNOLD, Judge.

      Defendant contends that the trial court erred in extending the time of defendant's trial beyond the 120 days provided in G.S. 15A-761, Article IV(c). We cannot agree.

      G.S. 15A-761, Article IV(c) provides: "In respect of any proceeding made possible by this Article, trial shall be commenced within 120 days of the arrival of the prisoner in the receiving state, but for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or his counsel being present...

      Let's get started

      Leagle.com

      Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
      Sign on now to see your case.
      Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

      • Updated daily.
      • Uncompromising quality.
      • Complete, Accurate, Current.

      Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

      Cited Cases

      • No Cases Found

      Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

      Citing Cases